Re: pam_timestamp internals

["Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv () altlinux org>]

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 01:46:43PM +0100, Sebastian Krahmer wrote:
> When playing with some PAM modules for my own projects, I came
> across some implications of pam_timestamp (which is part of
> upstream linux-pam) that should probably be addressed.
>
> Most importantly, there seems to be a path traversal issue:

Thanks, Sebastian!  The issue has been fixed in upstream linux-pam by commit
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/linux-pam.git/commit/?id=Linux-PAM-1_1_8-32-g9dcead8


-- 
ldv

Attachment: _bin
Description: