oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: OT What are the delays in delivery of Fyodor's Full Disclosure list?


From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:08:23 +0200

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:09:38AM -0700, Fyodor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>wrote:

Sorry for offtopic.

What are the delays in the delivery in
Fyodor's Full Disclosure list?


It is because the list is not even three days old yet and already has more
than 6,000 members and I'm still trying to set things up, including a team
of list members to help moderate.  But as of now, I'm still the only
moderator and I need to sleep sometimes.  I also have other projects to
work on than just moderating fulldisclosure.

Today at  17:06:09 +0200 I tried to post
to fulldisclosure () seclists org,
now is 17:53:51 EET 2014 and neither I
received the message nor it is on the mirror.


I'm sorry I wasn't able to get to your message in the first 47 minutes.
 But it did eventually post:

http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Mar/397


According to the headers it is more like
2 hours and 10 minutes.

"lightly moderated" is not far away from
"lightly pregnant" IMHO.


John tried to run the old fulldisclosure list unmoderated at first and it
lead to a disastrous crapflood of furry porn and other non-security junk as
soon as the list got big enough that trolls deemed it worthy to disrupt.
 He switched to moderation many years ago.  I think he may have set
auto-moderation for people who always post good stuff, and I hope we'll be
able to do that too.

If you want to try creating a fully unmoderated fulldisclosure list,
nothing is stopping you, and I sincerely wish you the best.


I don't see this thread on F-FD,
appears it is censored by moderation
just because the moderator didn't like
it. I see little difference with Bugtraq.

Let me remind that alpeh1 sold Bugtraq.

-- 
blog: https://j.ludost.net/blog/
forum: https://j.ludost.net/ss/index.php 


Current thread: