oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Over-embargoing


From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 14:02:18 +0200

If you ask me some large commercial distros suck much.

They pissed me off on several occasions,
broke the social contract and possibly
alienated other people.

FYI yesterday you lost a CMS bug because
of the lousy CVEs. I was playing with
CMS and noticed an ``anomaly'' which
I don't feel disclosing unless I am
sure it won't get _any_ CVE.


On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:49:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
At the Debian Security Team meeting <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/03/msg00004.html>,
the topic over-embargoing at Red Hat was touched briefly.

During the past year or two, we initiated quite a few embargoes for
mostly uninteresting bugs (denial of service, huge inputs required,
obscure software or configuration).  We did this mainly out of
courtesy for others, but we recognize the overhead an embargo
causes.  In retrospect, I'm not sure if we always made the right
choice.  What do you think?

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team


Current thread: