oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS

From: cve-assign () mitre org
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:05:46 -0500 (EST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't understand why is it relevant whether it's a genuine mistake or
logic error or an intentional bug?


There would be too many CVEs if every case of "does not read data as
fast as possible" were classified as a DoS problem.

- -- 
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTBgtKAAoJEKllVAevmvmsOocIAK0ZllaiL6eW4GxzxPTGZRDs
IPfsZCButrWZxtUW1DehkFzxvlqDDF3fS6oS01Qfd/fEpji7vzew7Xv8JGHykWYA
BMRws8zy9FRmE3/eBXpLp/gxrZ8VqtZ19qc8AdD5UyF3Tdb5YJXOOVdRiFKBFuxY
We6MIo7hCHDC3yylgqNJpaFMv51Vro7KK/p3ylkNZmi0hwordEmL5RhGUPYWo/P1
IvuU5n4E7bB9gSJtWnT20vsjWYj0eZNAKMPDuC+GluadC89SVlvqmBFLtDZvkOOf
BasxTeVEXPPDIQf+7ojP+RZcCzfHOtu/auK3qijXwy8PMwa2ZjRqyFWg8xi0O4E=
=AA8Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Current thread:

CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS P J P (Feb 17)
- Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS P J P (Feb 18)
- Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS cve-assign (Feb 19)
  - Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS P J P (Feb 19)
    - Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS cve-assign (Feb 20)
    - Re: Re: CVE request New-djbdns: dnscache: possible DoS P J P (Feb 20)