oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: CVE request: a2ps insecure temporary file use


From: cve-assign () mitre org
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 09:40:36 -0500 (EST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060630#c5

* Fri Jan 05 2001 Preston Brown <pbrown () redhat com>
- security patch for tmpfile creation from Olaf Kirch <okir () lst de>

followed the next month by a fix to that patch:

* Mon Feb 12 2001 Tim Waugh <twaugh () redhat com>
- Fix tmpfile security patch so that it actually _works_ (bug #27155).

Does anyone have information indicating that two CVE-2001-#### IDs are
needed to cover the discoveries by Olaf Kirch and Tim Waugh 13 years
ago? This would be the case if, for example, there was a January 2001
a2ps package that fixed part of the problem with temporary files.
Admittedly, the practical value of two CVE-2001-#### IDs at present
may be extremely small.

The information does not seem to be in a2ps.git because data before
2004 is unavailable, e.g.,

  http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/a2ps.git/log/?ofs=100

Also:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=27155
  You are not authorized to access bug #27155.

If (as we would expect) nobody is interested in checking that, we will
assign one CVE-2001-#### ID.

Finally, the earlier abstraction question is no longer relevant
because Jakub Wilk is apparently not the original discoverer of any
part of the problem. Specifically, this question:

  The original report notes there are calls to tempname_ensure(). If any
  of those are found to be vulnerable, would they use the same CVE number,
  or require a different one?

would only apply to a situation in which the spyname problem was a new
discovery in 2014.

- -- 
CVE assignment team, MITRE CVE Numbering Authority
M/S M300
202 Burlington Road, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[ PGP key available through http://cve.mitre.org/cve/request_id.html ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (SunOS)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS8PuRAAoJEKllVAevmvmsavAH/35erOpFeVh3fjUXXGdlJBVN
XzXwdKV6e+joCBJ2hYQ8+os5c19zFNdYcoAz8ay4DKdD9wEHUUiDjZDAhG1rWmDW
ji3I8Bbi3aMmZwaKqJwv3GYWVAOr6QzTuvKJoPVl835jF7Od1FUWeEaMPPqZmI9s
mwPp4eC4CjlVz8ldCgZdU+tiUZojJjl5wFBn/lnYsdfLisJ5mCi1YScMt3p5zZVE
FkXNu5MhFLEtfeQF2BUe3HLsk/UtNEq8T0cMsaNdIbckkFGKxiNiRfK8QGBHGRIp
KuFEoEufFAT0BNRMvHix4MFbYT+a2SKuC5lbrRa7jbyMWh9meRxze/s9UePtEno=
=cx5F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: