oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash
From: Marcus Meissner <meissner () suse de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 23:29:08 +0100
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:17:21PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Vincent Danen:The reason this doesn't crash for me on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 which ships 1.1.17 is because we included this patch (well, the developer did) a day after the initial build with the comment: - CVE-2012-2825 requires an extra patch on 1.1.17 So, I think this does require a second CVE.Has anyone shipped an incomplete update? If yes, then I think we actually need a second CVE. In the past, we got them for similar cases, and at least Debian's tracking more or less assumes that it's possible to assign CVEs to deal with such corner cases.
SUSE did, otherwise we would not have noticed :/ Ciao, Marcus
Current thread:
- CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Marcus Meissner (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Vincent Danen (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Florian Weimer (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Marcus Meissner (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Vincent Danen (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Kurt Seifried (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Florian Weimer (Nov 05)
- Re: CVE Request: additional fix for CVE-2012-2825 libxslt crash Vincent Danen (Nov 05)