oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: another glibc flaw, similar to CVE-2013-1914, but in AF_INET6
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:59:07 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/22/2013 04:42 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
It was found that the CVE-2013-1914 fix in glibc for AF_UNSPEC missed a an identical case but with AF_INET6. Could a CVE be assigned to this? This issue has the same impact as CVE-2013-1914. References: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-10/msg00733.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022280 Thanks.
Please use CVE-2013-4458 for this issue. - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSZy1qAAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTF/4P/2+5FLBkwlUwC55vTvbb2lq0 gnRYK3Ukme8ViRy0XZw/vm6p5g/7Wm8aj3DaTzA4cMuMMQ7fUL9E3ZUqP/xmltb6 CfvzcDhqZCNp8OyKSn5ELK8GFJxOToiwTijlN4gHJ+FostNq+PRtkBRh6x3HN9h5 sNBtXFKIqISRaZOVZD1mNCuPC2dvypP4SbCVuBNa7s24drwO2/rKMIVQxrJVbzMt XTRvMEWNqz83gUA4orBcDWB6dQvIfjQPxrtIebvLnZ0pL3iiRXhQsfRexmNjtQtc gCpmfKoa9bl1x9elExhAduSkFjoiaMlj5HT8vSWXT21ADd6r+0elu9LJLYKNNf6s HZ6WsuK3fSLLPWQ1oK0mve1PLbOEDykWxTUwtNdmeRTE3d1qWg7nE26O0MA8+W3t aTu/68gHCe+d7USlcUcvgF6cGKaqC4o3yS4iDcOMHVaStDUePXL6Kz+HGJ/pOzPc oBcUCCJ5ud88bGg2q1URXnEoyxHdVmgYRwDiNnWl6wX6cK86oaBHTAHmzoMTr0ro dm/+o5Lgz7R/3fXQHXswIez+DwhjKb+kd3sbkqAtDsn1NhVDy0rBSI1exMxMQaQe 1jfqae57/aKLzMJsDIX7+CLNz5tmcAoG+sZZr5daIMIfUYzIY26dV74QPTLjDql7 bW3SvoKIC5uiVqqDTKNk =BHAT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- CVE request: another glibc flaw, similar to CVE-2013-1914, but in AF_INET6 Vincent Danen (Oct 22)
- Re: CVE request: another glibc flaw, similar to CVE-2013-1914, but in AF_INET6 Kurt Seifried (Oct 22)