oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt () tls msk ru>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:51:49 +0400
10.07.2013 08:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 08:26 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:The thing is that I did _not_ get a reply, and did not get Adam's message either. I see them now in the archives but not in my inbox.fwiw, in the case of my first message you will only have the copy that went to the list, as mails have Reply-To: set and I didn't overrride that. (I've added you directly this time.)
Yes, I've seen this in the archives (on the openwall.com site). I'm subscribed to the list, and now I received two messages from you -- one sent to me directly and another that went to the list. For two other mails - the CVE-2013-2238 assignment (message from Kurt) and your note about it I received nothing at all. I'll watch archives from now on, to detect further mail loss and to try to understand what's going on. (And this is now not relevant to FreeSWITCH ofcourse... ;) Thanks! /mjt
Current thread:
- CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Michael Tokarev (Jul 01)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Kurt Seifried (Jul 03)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Michael Tokarev (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Kurt Seifried (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Adam D. Barratt (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Kurt Seifried (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Michael Tokarev (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Adam D. Barratt (Jul 09)
- Re: CVE request: FreeSWITCH regex substitution 3 buffer overflows Michael Tokarev (Jul 09)