oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow

From: Raphael Geissert <geissert () debian org>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:30:38 +0200

On 17 September 2013 04:27, Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com> wrote:

I prefer things to be explicit rather than assumed =).
Please use CVE-2013-4357  for this issue.


What exactly is that id meant to cover? do you have commit references
for the issue (singular)?
(also note that glibc#12671 is from 2011)

Or is the whole bunch of patches from extend_alloca supposed to be
CVE-noisy^Wworthy?

Cheers,
-- 
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net

Current thread:

Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Raphael Geissert (Jul 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Maksymilian (Jul 04)
  - Re: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Florian Weimer (Aug 22)
    - Re: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Florian Weimer (Sep 14)
    - Re: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Kurt Seifried (Sep 16)
    - Re: Re: CVE Request: glibc getaddrinfo() stack overflow Raphael Geissert (Sep 17)