oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Re: CVE request: unauthorized host/service views displayed in servicegroup view


From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:39:18 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/04/2013 07:19 PM, Vincent Danen wrote:
That somewhat proves my point. =). In both cases you're talking
about intended security being violated or a security-relevant
mistake.  I don't see how relaxing ACLs intentionally, but still
protected via authentication, meet either criteria.

-- Vincent Danen / Red Hat Security Response Team


On 2013-09-04, at 5:08 PM, cve-assign () mitre org wrote:

I think the first question is what constitutes a security
flaw -- once that is defined, then I think what upstream does
is irrelevant. If it's a flaw, it's a flaw.

CVE assignment by MITRE doesn't look at flaws in quite that way. If
a vendor has developed and released software and then sends us a
report that the software had a security-relevant mistake, or
violated that vendor's intended security policy, that's usually
enough for a CVE. Reports from third parties are viewed much more
restrictively.

A good example of this is in action:

http://docs.python.org/2/library/pickle.html
no CVE (big warning, safe alternatives, etc.)

http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=deserialization
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=deserializing
lots of CVEs

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=H5qh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: