oss-sec mailing list archives

Re: Thoughts on a vuln/CVE?


From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:53:03 -0600

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/18/2013 10:41 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:44:09AM -0600, Kurt Seifried wrote:
Also part of my thought process is that (for example) this would
be a good configuration to check for and ensure is disabled,
something for SCAP for example or the Debian security guide (e.g.
a generic "make sure all enabled repos are actually working as
expected").

Debian doesn't endorse any external repository. During package
installation the pre/post installation scripts run with root privs.
As such, if you enable a repository you trust the people behind
that repository with the equivalent to root access to your system
anyway.

Cheers, Moritz


I care a lot less about what is "officially endorsed" or not endorsed
and a lot more with what is actually going on. If a large percentage
of people are exposed to a vuln, even if they "shouldn't" be then it
would still get a CVE. I see a lot of CVEs that should never be
exploitable, but people do crazy things/configurations.

- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=2e/6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: