oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT
From: Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:06:31 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2013 03:30 PM, Damien Regad wrote:
Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com> Wrote in message:4. XSS issue on Configuration Report page when displaying complex value This issue affects Mantis 1.2.0rc1 and later. Lack of proper string escaping allows users (having admin access) to enter arbitrary javascript code and have it executed on the user's browser. Reference: http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=15416Does this count as a proper release or does it fall into the "beta" classification?1.2.0rc1 was a beta release. The first "proper" release affected by this was 1.2.0Ok not assigning a CVE then, unless there are a large number of users betas don't get CVEs.Steve just pointed out I may have misread this. Is 1.2.0 vulnerable, and this is fixed in 1.2.1, or was it fixed in the 1.2.0 release (so ONLY 1.2.0-rc1 was affected)?Not sure who Steve is, but he is absolutely correct - this affects all versions of Mantis *starting* with rc1 and until 1.2.13 included, so definitely non-beta releases are vulnerable.
Steve/Steven is coley () mitre org (CVE head honcho). So:
Lack of proper string escaping allows users (having admin access) to enter arbitrary javascript code and have it executed on the user's browser.
Please use CVE-2013-1934 for this issue - -- Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT) PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRY4W3AAoJEBYNRVNeJnmTvKgQAKAEFc2L4kNxNLUCq9aLh9l2 RAKnDjrs2pb5kSHyUMXfJ7oN9AhP3U6QXRKZFLwSNbipRVbtuEbFbAHleYAObaiL CPCBPyY0HztDiEaFDJ0mls45EBJnB3oa5xitPzT/XFQqoM3ua+wnC8p7yy5wgE/u 0t4g8UPTW9+mSYOzQq3hbmz5q8SK3KnZc/ff4dXP6+wsvBhezoRR6N12wU0om5Zf 6tDInYlF4M2Fqc03b97A5KRdJqcvJqzbc09ZLQxQZFZofXB5wy1uut2Iz0oI/4On yYTQrxXEVmnu+0ggGYtyvpjmGRcKQ/Eh/XzfKHbKo3VrGaA3dIWiBXC9kdLMJfJV /rjrCgvhoyC7aFgQT5c3vBdbIi1xy8eu66wNsay0oohb+pNS99A3iemiZIXMVQXr bKz2/kmV1ACLFO0FNDEChkjw4NWlIn3NEStHAgqBz70o/Iv8WTVK6f1jTPzL7JvP kKeBwk7hxnScBbVGvGMWTCWNx5rLt2HgLtdbmHzEhfrOscTVojwAkPTgaeZwxjZ2 9rnd0T0D/pl5j6FKxurj0Q1AVwlepAx3pLc+cqmfD/3MWBdP+5p4l0CUfRlfMQXQ ao7qHY27hX2mFrem2d0ZZ7ZYIAvkMThorHsjJJ6qT9ZUgzx/geNbeJX+UNh5j3qI vlp2GtzONWjFUhUGKgR/ =h4sZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Damien Regad (Apr 04)
- Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Kurt Seifried (Apr 05)
- Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Damien Regad (Apr 08)
- Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Kurt Seifried (Apr 08)
- Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Kurt Seifried (Apr 08)
- Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Damien Regad (Apr 08)
- Re: Re: Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Kurt Seifried (Apr 08)
- Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Damien Regad (Apr 08)
- Re: Multiple CVE requests for MantisBT Kurt Seifried (Apr 05)