oss-sec mailing list archives

browser document.cookie DoS vulnerability


From: Stefan Bühler <stbuehler () lighttpd net>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:58:18 +0200

Hi,

Chromium 25.0.1364.160 (debian testing), Iceweasel/Firefox 19 and
probably many other browsers allow javascript to set broken cookie
values, leading to possible permanent "400 Bad Request" responses. The
broken value might be set by 3rd party libraries.

For example the google analytics code is vulnerable, as it sets cookie
values based on parameters in the referer query string. lighttpd does
not allow control characters in http header values, so any lighttpd
site using google analytics is vulnerable if you can get the user to
follow a link (img tag for example) to that site like this:

http://www.example.com/?utm_source=test&utm_medium=test&utm_campaign=te%05st


Afaik apache doesn't check the cookie values (or perhaps removes the
broken characters). Imho they are responsible for this mess :)

To be clear: the bug is in the browser / javascript implementation:

document.cookie MUST NOT allow cookie values which include certain
control characters. Javascript applications should not use 8-bit
characters.

(If browser vendors want to allow broken cookie values to be stored,
they MUST NOT send them to the server; in this case javascript
applications can still read the broken values. But I don't think this
is a good idea.)

The safe character set for HTTP header values is: %x20-7E; %x80-FF is
obsoleted by the current draft.

"A recipient MAY replace any linear white space with a single SP before
interpreting the field value", so horizontal tabs are not "safe" - they
might get converted to a space, but are not forbidden (also multiple
spaces can get replaced by a single one).

I think this could use a CVE.

The problem was reported in our lighttpd bug tracker:
http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2188

Kind regards,
Stefan


Testing the bug:

Try one of the listed urls in the ticket (the error should trigger
after a reload). If you have noscript, request policy, referer control
or similar stuff running you are probably safe; to test the bug in this
case you need a Javascript console on a lighttpd site
(http://lighttpd.net for example), and enter:

document.cookie = "foo=bar\x05test"
Try to reload the page - it should return a 400 Bad Request page now.

document.cookie = "foo="
And it should work again.


HTTP references:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616
message-header = field-name ":" [ field-value ]
field-name     = token
field-value    = *( field-content | LWS )
field-content  = *TEXT | *(token | separators | quoted-string)
LWS            = [CRLF] 1*( SP | HTAB )

# TEXT is superset of (token | separators | quoted-string)
TEXT = LWS | %x21-7E | %x80-FF

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-22
header-field   = field-name ":" OWS field-value BWS
field-name     = token
field-value    = *( field-content / obs-fold )
field-content  = *( HTAB / SP / VCHAR / obs-text )
obs-fold       = CRLF ( SP / HTAB )

# obsolete text
obs-text = %x80-FF

Basic definitions:
# horizontal tab
HTAB = %x09
# space
SP = %x20
# visible ASCII
VCHAR = %x21-7E
# carriage return + line feed
CRLF = %0x0D %0x0A

Attachment: signature.asc
Description:


Current thread: