Re: CVE Request: various gems in aftermath of rubygem actionpack issue

[Kurt Seifried <kseifried () redhat com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/01/2013 09:43 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think these rubygem updates have got no CVE entry/ies yet: 
> https://support.cloud.engineyard.com/entries/22915701-january-14-2013-security-vulnerabilities-httparty-extlib-crack-nori-update-these-gems-immediately
>
>  Or should we use the Rubygem Action Pack CVE ids for it too
> (CVE-2013-0156)?
>
> Ciao, Marcus

I need details before I can assign CVEs for those. Can you maybe
generate diffs that show the code fixes and post them? thanks.


- -- 
Kurt Seifried Red Hat Security Response Team (SRT)
PGP: 0x5E267993 A90B F995 7350 148F 66BF 7554 160D 4553 5E26 7993

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=DtfD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----