oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: libdbus hardening
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:22:28 +0400
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Sebastian Krahmer wrote:
I am fine with either solution and would prefer upstream patches anyway, but it turned out in past that nobody from upstream is willing to add such patches.
If this is not for upstream and you only need it working on a particular distro with glibc, then why not use __secure_getenv()?
I tried a year ago with openssl and AFAIK its still suffering (at least I never heared back). If you compile your openssh '--with-ssl-engine' you have an easy root exploit (given that ssh-keysign is mode 04755 such as on Debian) via OPENSSL_config(). If you ask me, thats quite poor for a framework that wants to add security to the system. So, I do not have any problems adding our own patch sets rather than waiting for another year.
Of course. Alexander
Current thread:
- libdbus hardening Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Florian Weimer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Florian Weimer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening yersinia (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Florian Weimer (Jul 11)
- Re: libdbus hardening Florian Weimer (Jul 10)
- Re: libdbus hardening Tomas Hoger (Sep 13)
- Re: libdbus hardening Sebastian Krahmer (Jul 11)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 11)
- Re: libdbus hardening yersinia (Jul 11)
- Re: libdbus hardening Solar Designer (Jul 17)
- Re: libdbus hardening Florian Weimer (Jul 17)