oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments
From: Eugene Teo <eteo () redhat com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 06:08:29 +0800
On 12/24/2011 04:52 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote:
On 12/22/2011 09:44 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:Hi, there were a two Linux-related CVE requests/discussions, which didn't end up in an assignment: 1: rose: Add length checks to CALL_REQUEST parsing e0bccd315db0c2f919e7fcf9cb60db21d9986f52 in mainline It was decided that this should be split, but without a final resulting CVE assignment: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/12/1Can anyone shed more light on this for me? (links to fixes/etc.?).
I have forwarded you the email thread. This patch refers to the changes made by Ben Hutchings. Eugene
Current thread:
- Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Moritz Muehlenhoff (Dec 22)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Kurt Seifried (Dec 23)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Michael Gilbert (Dec 23)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Solar Designer (Dec 23)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Eugene Teo (Dec 24)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Vasiliy Kulikov (Dec 27)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Kurt Seifried (Dec 27)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Kurt Seifried (Dec 27)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Eugene Teo (Dec 24)
- Re: Status of two Linux kernel issues w/o CVE assignments Kurt Seifried (Dec 23)