oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason () zx2c4 com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:53:41 -0400
Just do clarify: Issues 1 through 7.1 (8 issues) were released with the current version that has been out for quite some time now. These require a CVE. Issues 8 through 14 are ones introduced only during development and were not released, and do not need a CVE. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 16:51, Steven M. Christey <coley () rcf-smtp mitre org>wrote:
All, I haven't followed the Calibre saga too closely, barring glancing through the bug report comments. If bugs are introduced into a development version but also fixed within that same version, then unless there's some strong evidence that the dev version is extensively used or distributed to the public, then (in general) it would not get a CVE. (The Linux kernel is a special case depending on what versions you consider to be "development.") - Steve
Current thread:
- CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 01)
- Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Dan Rosenberg (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Kurt Seifried (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Steven M. Christey (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 04)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Kurt Seifried (Nov 06)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 06)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Kurt Seifried (Nov 08)
- Re: Re: CVE request for Calibre Dan Rosenberg (Nov 03)
- Re: CVE request for Calibre Jason A. Donenfeld (Nov 01)