oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui
From: dave bl <db.pub.mail () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:53:15 +1000
On 5 August 2011 03:53, Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 00:17 +1000, dave bl wrote:So while there aren't that many "users" of the old system-config-printer - it appears that debian old-stable (lenny) maybe vulnerable (where python-smbc is not available) ... is it worth while giving system-config-printer a 2008 CVE as well (if none currently exists).Yes, I think it is worth doing that.This request doesn't really make any sense. It deserves a 2011 ID, that's when the flaw was discovered.
Ah ok, this why I asked ^ ^.
Current thread:
- CVE Request: foomatic-gui Marc Deslauriers (Aug 03)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Tim Waugh (Aug 03)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Josh Bressers (Aug 03)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui dave bl (Aug 04)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Henri Salo (Aug 04)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Tim Waugh (Aug 04)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Josh Bressers (Aug 04)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Tim Waugh (Aug 05)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui dave bl (Aug 05)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui Huzaifa Sidhpurwala (Aug 11)
- Re: CVE Request: foomatic-gui dave bl (Aug 04)