oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: RE: [security-vendor] [oss-security] Closed list
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:57:09 +0200
Hi Zhenfeng! Now that I'm already known for being corporatishly evil against smaller distros... ;) On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:04:05 +0000 Zhao, Zhenfeng wrote:
uid Zhenfeng Zhao (Wind River) <security-vendor () windriver com>
My understanding of the membership rules is that the aim is to avoid exploders or other mechanisms that may make it easier to change who is receiving mails without list admin and members being aware of such change. While this may not be an exploder address now, for addresses like security@, they seem to be less likely to be closed once the people behind them decide to move on and are replaced by someone else. It seems there may be more pressure to hand matching private key over during the transition of responsibilities from one person to another. Just my 2c. -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- Re: Closed list, (continued)
- Re: Closed list akuster (May 26)
- Re: Closed list Dan Rosenberg (May 26)
- Re: Closed list akuster (May 26)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Jun 01)
- Re: Closed list akuster (Jun 01)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 12)
- [security-vendor] Re: [oss-security] Closed list Zhao, Zhenfeng (Apr 14)
- [security-vendor] Re: [oss-security] Closed list Zhao, Zhenfeng (Apr 15)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 24)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 24)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 12)
- Re: Re: Closed list Meltem Parmaksız (Apr 14)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 24)
- Re: Closed list Solar Designer (Apr 12)
- Re: Closed list Jeff Mitchell (Apr 26)
- Re: Closed list Jeff Mitchell (Apr 30)