oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general()
From: Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:31:25 -0500 (EST)
Please use CVE-2010-4157 Thanks. -- JB ----- "Petr Matousek" <pmatouse () redhat com> wrote:
"gdth_ioctl_alloc() takes the size variable as an int. copy_from_user() takes the size variable as an unsigned long. gen.data_len and gen.sense_len are unsigned longs. On x86_64 longs are 64 bit and ints are 32 bit. We could pass in a very large number and the allocation would truncate the size to 32 bits and allocate a small buffer. Then when we do the copy_from_user(), it would result in a memory corruption." Upstream commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=f63ae56e4e97fb12053590e41a4fa59e7daa74a4 Credit: James E.J. Bottomley Reference: http://ns3.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg47361.html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651147 Thanks, -- Petr Matousek / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general() Petr Matousek (Nov 08)
- Re: CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general() Dan Rosenberg (Nov 08)
- Re: CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general() Josh Bressers (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general() Petr Matousek (Nov 09)
- Re: CVE request: kernel: gdth: integer overflow in ioc_general() Dan Rosenberg (Nov 09)