oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue
From: Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
This clearly needs a CVE id. Use CVE-2010-2525 Thanks. -- JB ----- "Dan Rosenberg" <dan.j.rosenberg () gmail com> wrote:
To elaborate on the issue: the gfs2 filesystem in 2.6.32 kernels currently allows any user to set arbitrary ACLs for files they do not own, essentially granting full access to everything. The source of this problem also caused other misbehavior of ACLs. This fix resolved the issue for 2.6.33, but it was not backported, so 2.6.32 remains vulnerable. -Dan On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Eugene Teo <eugeneteo () kernel sg> wrote:Upstream commit 2646a1f6 (2.6.33-rc1) fixed an interesting gfs2 aclissuelate last year. Thanks Dan Rosenberg for informing us about this.http://git.kernel.org/linus/2646a1f61a3b5525914757f10fa12b5b94713648I didn't request a CVE name for this but if you need one, pingSteve.Thanks, Eugene -- main(i) { putchar(182623909 >> (i-1) * 5&31|!!(i<7)<<6) &&main(++i); }
Current thread:
- kernel: gfs2 acl issue Eugene Teo (Jul 08)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue Dan Rosenberg (Jul 08)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue Eugene Teo (Jul 08)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue Josh Bressers (Jul 09)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue akuster (Jul 09)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue Dan Rosenberg (Jul 09)
- Re: kernel: gfs2 acl issue Dan Rosenberg (Jul 08)