oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable
From: Solar Designer <solar () openwall com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:49:44 +0400
I got to quit commenting on my own postings, here's the last one at least for today, as I am obviously too tired. I wrote:
It occurred to me, from a few things I've seen/read lately, that RHEL 5 must indeed already include a back-port of the mmap_min_addr feature, although somehow it is not in OpenVZ's patch-128.1.1.el5.028stab062.3 (was added after the -128 revision?), which is why I am adding my own back-port of mmap_min_addr on top of that patch.
I had recalled incorrectly. As Eugene reminded me off-list, the extra patch I was actually referring to was about making the mmap_min_addr support (already present in RHEL 5 kernels, including the revision mentioned above) available independently of CONFIG_SECURITY. Alexander
Current thread:
- Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable yersinia (Jul 17)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Solar Designer (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Marcus Meissner (Jul 20)
- Re: Linux 2.6.30+/SELinux/RHEL5 test kernel 0day, exploiting the unexploitable Julien Tinnes (Jul 20)