oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: CVE request: jhead
From: Tomas Hoger <thoger () redhat com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 18:20:49 +0100
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:21:54 +0100 Robert Buchholz <rbu () gentoo org> wrote:
These two issues have been resolved in the current "jhead-latest.tar.gz" distributed on the upstream site. Both Ubuntu and Debian have renamed one version of this file to be "2.85" whereas upstream has not yet released any 2.85 version. Upstream stated that they will release a 2.85 not before next year, so anyone who has this issue open can either extract patches, package the snapshot or wait.
Looks like -latest tarball was updated again and now mentions 2.86 inside. In that, usage of mkstemp was replaced with mktemp (previous version failed to close file descriptors opened by mkstemp, probably causing issues when trying to use command on large pile of images at once). Those the temp file seem to be created user-specified destination directory, probably not too likely to be /tmp (and hence prone to races). Anyway, can anyone help me understand what was CVE-2008-4639 assigned to? I tried looking at the diff between 2.7 and 2.84 and fail to see any relevant change... -- Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team
Current thread:
- Re: CVE request: jhead Tomas Hoger (Feb 06)
- Re: CVE request: jhead Steven M. Christey (Mar 19)