oss-sec mailing list archives
Re: firefox 2.0.0.13
From: Josh Bressers <bressers () redhat com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:12:15 -0400
The advisories should be posted soon. It is a security update comparable to past ones.Josh, Any idea on what Mozilla means by using CVE-2008-1240 in MFSA 2008-18? They already list CVE-2008-1195, which is associated with the Sun advisory, and that seems like the only issue they're really trying to address.
Hi Steve, That's the one I mailed you about back when I was assigning the CVE ids ;) The Mozilla advisory doesn't clarify that CVE-2008-1195 is the Sun CVE id for their java advisory: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-233326-1 This flaw is now fixed in both Java and Firefox (it's debatable who is at fault here, both the browser and the JRE were doing silly things). As you gave me the advice that since the codebases are different, they should get separate ids. We can always yank CVE-2008-1240 if you wish and I'll see about getting upstream to remove it from the advisory. If we're keeping CVE-2008-1240, it would probably be wise of Mozilla to clarify CVE-2008-1195 is for the JVM. Thanks. -- JB
Current thread:
- firefox 2.0.0.13 Jonathan Smith (Mar 25)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Josh Bressers (Mar 25)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Vincent Danen (Mar 25)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Steven M. Christey (Mar 26)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Josh Bressers (Mar 27)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Steven M. Christey (Mar 27)
- Re: firefox 2.0.0.13 Josh Bressers (Mar 25)