Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default?
From: Ionel <cadar24 () sapo pt>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 03:52:04 +0100
Stop sending mails to me Sent from my iPhone
On 9 Aug 2017, at 02:32, nnposter <nnposter () users sourceforge net> wrote:On 8/8/17 3:54 PM, Daniel Miller wrote: A: Scan all resolved addresses by default. Example: nmap example.com <http://example.com> Result: scans 5 IP addresses for example.com <http://example.com> To preserve current behavior: nmap --resolveone example.com <http://example.com> B: Scan only the first resolved address by default (current behavior) Example: nmap --resolveall example.com <http://example.com> Result: scans 5 IP addresses for example.com <http://example.com> Otherwise no change to current behavior.The ability to go after all associated IP addresses in a simple fashion is highly useful. That said, this expansion should be IMHO requested explicitly. Option B would be my strong preference. Cheers, nnposter _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? Daniel Miller (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? Daniel Miller (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? jah (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? Paulino Calderon (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? nnposter (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC: Should Nmap resolve and scan all addresses by default? Ionel (Aug 08)