Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32
From: "Michael D. Lawler" <mdlawler () lawlers us>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:32:46 -0400
Yes, the new version fixes it for 127.0.0.1, but not if you ping the local IP address of your machine. either with ip address or machine name
Starting Nping 0.7.31 ( https://nmap.org/nping ) at 2016-10-25 00:29 Eastern Daylight Time SENT (0.1320s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=1] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=1] IP [ttl=128 id=16704 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16705 iplen=56 ] SENT (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=2] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=2] IP [ttl=128 id=16708 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16709 iplen=56 ] SENT (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=3] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=3] IP [ttl=128 id=16710 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16711 iplen=56 ] SENT (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=4] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=4] IP [ttl=128 id=16716 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=16717 iplen=56 ] SENT (4.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=358 seq=5] IP [ttl=64 id=50100 iplen=28 ] RCVD (4.1880s) ICMP [192.168.1.100 > 192.168.1.100 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=358 seq=5] IP [ttl=128 id=16720 iplen=28 ]
Max rtt: 0.000ms | Min rtt: 0.000ms | Avg rtt: 0.000ms Raw packets sent: 5 (210B) | Rcvd: 9 (364B) | Lost: 0 (0.00%) Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 4.19 seconds At 11:07 PM 10/24/2016, é£è大ç°å V5 wrote:
Hi Michael,I should have fixed this issue in latest Npcap 0.10 r11, please try it at:Â <https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releases>https://github.com/nmap/npcap/releasesCheers, YangOn Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Michael D. Lawler <<mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us>mdlawler () lawlers us> wrote:This is with 7.31 and npcap 0.10R9Starting Nping 0.7.31 ( <https://nmap.org/nping>https://nmap.org/nping ) at 2016-10-22 09:15 Eastern Daylight Time SENT (0.1420s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=1] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=1] IP [ttl=128 id=27914 iplen=28 ] RCVD (0.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27915 iplen=56 ] SENT (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=2] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=2] IP [ttl=128 id=27917 iplen=28 ] RCVD (1.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27918 iplen=56 ] SENT (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=3] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=3] IP [ttl=128 id=27920 iplen=28 ] RCVD (2.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27921 iplen=56 ] SENT (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=4] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=4] IP [ttl=128 id=27923 iplen=28 ] RCVD (3.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Protocol 1 unreachable (type=3/code=2) ] IP [ttl=128 id=27924 iplen=56 ] SENT (4.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo request (type=8/code=0) id=47715 seq=5] IP [ttl=64 id=23497 iplen=28 ] RCVD (4.2040s) ICMP [127.0.0.1 > 127.0.0.1 Echo reply (type=0/code=0) id=47715 seq=5] IP [ttl=128 id=27926 iplen=28 ]Max rtt: 0.000ms | Min rtt: 0.000ms | Avg rtt: 0.000ms Raw packets sent: 5 (210B) | Rcvd: 9 (364B) | Lost: 0 (0.00%) Nping done: 1 IP address pinged in 4.20 seconds -- Michael D. Lawler email mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list <https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev>https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at <http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/>http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/ _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
-- Michael D. Lawler email mailto:mdlawler () lawlers us
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 22)
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 食肉大灰兔V5 (Oct 24)
- Message not available
- Re: nping showing both unreachable and successful replies for localhost under Win 7 32 Michael D. Lawler (Oct 25)