Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade!
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:26:42 -0500
Patrick, These changes temporarily broke nsedoc generation. The specific issue I'm running into is detection of a file's "module" status, which we previously did with this chunk of Lua 5.1 code: -- module"x.y" -- module'x.y' local _, m1 = string.match(line, "^%s*module%s*([\"'])(.-[^\\])%1"); -- module[[x.y]] local _, m2 = string.match(line, "^%s*module%s*%[(=*)%[(.-)%]%1%]"); -- module([... or ]"x.y") -- module([... or ]'x.y') local _, m3 = string.match(line, "^%s*module%s*%(.-([\"'])(.-[^\\])%1"); -- module([... or ][[x.y]]) local _, m4 = string.match(line, "^%s*module%s*%(.-%[(=*)%[(.-)%]%1%]"); -- module(...) local _, m5 = string.match(line, "^%s*module%s*%(%s*%.%.%.%s*[,%)]"); -- _ENV = stdnse.module("name" local _, m6 = string.match(line, "^%s*_ENV%s*=%s*stdnse%s*%.%s*module%s*%(?%s*([\"'])(.-[^\\])%1"); -- _ENV = require "stdnse".module "base32" local _, _, m7 = string.match(line, "^%s*_ENV%s*=%s*require%s*([\"'])stdnse%1%s*%.%s*module%s*%(?%s*([\"'])(.-[^\\])%2"); local modulename = m1 or m2 or m3 or m4 or m5 or m6 or m7; I actually added that last one (m7) because of the syntax you used in base32.lua. But so far it appears the libraries bin, bit, and bits all do not use stdnse.module. I found a workaround by using the "@class module" and "@name" NSEdoc tags, but I wanted to know more about stdnse.module and stdnse.seeall. These are documented as "mimicking" the behavior of Lua 5.1, but are we using any of this behavior? Could all libs be converted to just returning _ENV and using @class and @name tags? Dan On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com> wrote:On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>wrote:On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>wrote:On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>wrote:Without further ado, here's the branch: https://github.com/batrick/nmap/tree/nse-lua53If there are no questions/comments/complaints/objections, I'd like to merge the branch sometime around next Friday. All feedback is still welcome!I've incorporated Daniel's suggestions. The branch is now in svn: https://svn.nmap.org/nmap-exp/patrick/nse-lua53 Last call for comments. I plan to merge into /nmap tomorrow.Alright, I've resolved all of the reported problems. I will give the branch another few days to cool before merging. Please keep testing everyone!Merged in https://svn.nmap.org/nmap@35945. -- Patrick Donnelly _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 02)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Tom Sellers (Jul 07)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 07)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Paulino Calderon (Jul 15)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 16)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Daniel Miller (Jul 16)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Paulino Calderon (Jul 17)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 17)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 07)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Tom Sellers (Jul 07)
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! Patrick Donnelly (Jul 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Completed Lua 5.3 upgrade! jah (Aug 11)