Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: -iR and ip6
From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:31:12 +0100
W dniu 01.02.2016 o 08:46, Mike . pisze:
hello all maybe a dumb ?? here, but why is -iR not supported for ipv6? can we not randomly generate those ip pools the same as 4? i admit, i don't mess with the prototcol alot so i may not know it's limitations, so fill me in Mike
"Clearly the Internet needs more IP addresses. How many more, exactly? Well, how about 340 trillion trillion trillion (or, 340,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)? That's how many addresses the Internet's new "piping," IPv6, can handle. That's a number big enough to give everyone on Earth their own list of billions of IP addresses. Big enough, in other words, to offer the Internet virtually infinite room to grow, from now into the foreseeable future." Source: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/#pipeline-II In IPv6, it's normal for ISP clients to get whole large subnets of IPv6 address space for their own usage. Suppose you get /32, which gives you 4 billion addresses and you're quite likely only going to use a few of them. Finding your subnet alone would be rather difficult to do randomly and then one'd also need to find your host. That's way less likely to happen than winning latest Powerball [1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerball
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- -iR and ip6 Mike . (Jan 31)
- Re: -iR and ip6 Jacek Wielemborek (Feb 01)