Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: second batch of top ports
From: Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:46:56 -0500
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Robin Wood <robin@digi.ninja> wrote:
I've ran a scan with --top-ports 100 but I'd now like to run a scan for ports 100-200, I can't see any obvious way to do this except for using the exclude port option which would be quite messy, is there a better way?
Robin, There's not a good way to do this currently. If we were to add such a feature, I think it would be best to consider requirements of someone splitting up a range of hosts or ports to be scanned by different scanners, similar to John the Ripper's --node option. For a workaround, here's a command built around Grepable [1] output's ability to print a list of scanned ports: nmap --top-ports 200 --exclude $(./nmap --top-ports 100 localhost -Pn -n -oG - -v | awk -F'[;)]' '/TCP\(/{print $2}') Dan [1] http://nmap.org/book/output-formats-grepable-output.html
_______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- second batch of top ports Robin Wood (Apr 24)
- Re: second batch of top ports Daniel Miller (Apr 24)
- Re: second batch of top ports Robin Wood (Apr 24)
- Re: second batch of top ports Daniel Miller (Apr 24)