Re: [RFC] smb-check-vulns port to nse vulns lib

[Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>]

W dniu 25.06.2015 o 14:51, Daniel Miller pisze:
> Andrew,
>
>
> A single script can have multiple vuln tables, and return them all in a
> single report. However, I would not choose to do that for this script.
>
> A few days ago, I added an enhancement request #171, "Split smb-check-vulns
> into separate smb-vuln-msXX-XXX.nse scripts". This would allow users to
> check for specific issues by name, not by "danger" or "safety" of the
> check. We can use categories to control which checks are run: safe,
> intrusive, and dos are relevant to this sort of check. For the Conficker
> infection check, we can use the malware category, too.
>
> Dan

This sounds like Andrew's task should split in two then. The way I
understand it, he only has this (and perhaps one more?) script to
convert before he's done porting non-vulns scripts to vulns library.
Does this mean he should skip this one and perhaps split it later or
port it as well and leave splitting for later?

d33tah

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/