Re: [RFC] Should --open imply --defeat-rst-ratelimit?

[Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>]

W dniu 13.05.2015 o 21:16, Daniel Miller pisze:
> If the user is only interested in open ports, shouldn't we avoid spending
> extra time determining closed vs filtered status?
>
> Dan

I like the idea, but I'd like to point out that we mention the port
states in "Not shown: 94 closed ports, 4 filtered ports" message when
using --open. Perhaps setting ports to closed|reset would be more
intuitive here?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/