Nmap Development mailing list archives
My question on combining the --min-hostgroup, --min-parallelism, and --host-timeout options.
From: Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 04:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
Hi all, When I use nmap for scanning on large scale networks. I want to combine the following options to obtain the gain on correctness and efficiency: --min-hostgroup, --min-parallelism, and --host-timeout. But I have the following issues which I cann't figure out: 1. As for the --min-hostgroup and --min-parallelism, are there some relationships on setting the values for both of them according to the rule of thumb? Say, if I set --min-hostgroup 100, I should set what value for --min-parallelism in order obtain effective gain on correctness and efficiency of my scanning? 2. Again, are there some rule of thumb for setting the --host-timeout, when the above two parameters - --min-hostgroup and --min-parallelism - have been set? Regards -- .: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :. _______________________________________________ Sent through the dev mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- My question on combining the --min-hostgroup, --min-parallelism, and --host-timeout options. Hongyi Zhao (Mar 26)