Re: [NSE] Extended ssl-enum-ciphers script

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Royce Williams <royce () techsolvency com>
wrote:

> is there any reason to not combine the two lists
> ciphers in their preferred order, instead of the two 'ciphers' and
> 'preferred ciphers order' lists?

Royce,

This is indeed the approach that I took when updating the script yesterday.
You can see example output here:
http://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/ssl-enum-ciphers.html

There may be a good reason for doing it separately, since both Bojan and
David's implementations did so. If someone feels that keeping separate
lists (alphabetical with strength, server preference) is important, they
are welcome to submit a patch for discussion.

Dan
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/