Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: [FEATURE] Multible scan options in the same run


From: Jacek Wielemborek <d33tah () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:14:12 +0100

10/12/2013 11:03:57 Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>:
On 12/10/2013 08:02 AM, John Bond wrote:
* How will NSE portrules work when the port is in multiple states?

I'd probably stick with SYN for the portrules. My intention was to point out 
that this way one could easily spot the interesting differences between scan 
results, but these don't necessarily have to lead to discovering new open 
ports. SYN scan/-sT is AFAIK most reliable there.

* How can this be made better than a shell script that runs each type in
sequence?

You could do quite a lot in shell scripts, but configuring output and 
parallelism would be pretty hard there. That's why I'd say that it belongs to 
the scanner instead.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Current thread: