Re: GSoC 2013 - Improved Port Specification project

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

On 04/26/2013 12:13 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:24:57PM +0530, Prakash Gamit wrote:
> > $ nmap -p1234,5678,1111,4321 --top-ports 2 <ip-address>
> > scans top two ports(1111,1234 in this case) of the list given with -p.
> >
> > see this thread => http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2012/q3/382
> I think that feature should be removed in favor of taking the union.
As long as this is being reworked, the oft-requested "exclude-ports" 
option should probably be implemented. It's really the only reason that 
the old (undocumented) behavior is useful.

Dan
_______________________________________________
Sent through the dev mailing list
http://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/