Nmap Development mailing list archives
RE: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003
From: "Rob Nicholls" <robert () robnicholls co uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:29:39 -0000
Hi, I think David may have been confused into thinking two different people were talking about the same bug, as the original emails you sent had the name "rirong zhu", but your recent couple of emails now say "Jarett" (the email address is the same for all of the emails). David, I think the subnets aren't being determined correctly when there's more than one IP address assigned to an interface. I've just checked a Windows 7 host that has two IP addresses running over the same interface (a workaround on a test network due to a lack of spare physical interfaces, not something I'd normally do) and instead of showing the correct subnet of /25 it's showing a subnet of /24 (which matches the subnet of the second IP address assigned to the interface). It looks like the subnet is correctly identified/shown in the ROUTES output (for me and Jarett), but is incorrect under the INTERFACES output. If we were to assume that the subnet mask should be /28 for 115.236.23.45 instead of /29 I suspect it'll work as Nmap should know it can reach 115.236.23.33 directly (instead of trying to route it through 115.236.23.45, which is probably why we're seeing "localhost" issues). Jarett, as a workaround, it may be possible for Nmap to work if the second IP (i.e. 124.160.125.118) is removed from the interface, assuming you're able to do that. Rob
-----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev- bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of Jarett Sent: 30 November 2012 04:12 To: nmap-dev () insecure org Subject: Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 no,I send the email last week,I want to know if you found the problem?Because I can't use nmap right now,or you have to update the software to solve this problem? 2012/11/29 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:46:13PM +0800, Jarett wrote:hello, can you tell me how to solve this problem,or it's a bug?Are you experiencing the same problem? Please send the output of these commands: nmap --iflist nmap --route-dst scanme.nmap.org nmap -e eth0 --route-dst scanme.nmap.org route print Also, what operating system are you running? David Fifield_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 20)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 20)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 22)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 22)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 23)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Jarett (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 28)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Jarett (Nov 30)
- RE: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 Rob Nicholls (Nov 30)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 rirong zhu (Nov 21)
- Re: Nmap got a wrong result in windows 2003 David Fifield (Nov 20)