Re: [nmap-svn] r29615 - nmap/scripts

[Daniel Miller <bonsaiviking () gmail com>]

On 09/07/2012 10:34 AM, David Fifield wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:20:53AM -0500, Daniel Miller wrote:
> > On 09/06/2012 07:15 PM, David Fifield wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:13:33PM -0700, commit-mailer () insecure org wrote:
> > > > Author: dmiller
> > > > Date: Thu Aug 16 15:13:33 2012
> > > > New Revision: 29615
> > > >
> > > > Log:
> > > > Update ssl-date to use structured output
> > > Could you change this to use the same output format as http-date
> > > instead? Not this:
> > >    <elem key="date">2012-08-02T18:29:31</elem>
> > >    <elem key="offset">+4s</elem>
> > > but this:
> > >    <elem key="date">2012-08-02T18:29:31Z</elem>$
> > >    <elem key="delta">4</elem>$
> > Done in r29724. There was a bug as well, that the time was output as
> > local, but labelled as UTC. Fixed by prepending "!" to the time
> > format string passed to os.date().
> Okay, thanks. But I think that normal output should still use
> format_difftime, while the structured output uses just an integer. (The
> same as http-date does.) My reasoning is that a person reading Nmap
> output would rather see "+1m4s" and a program processing Nmap results
> would rather see "64".
>
> David Fifield
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Ok, I missed that when looking at http-date. Should be good now (r29725).

Dan
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/