Re: pcanywhere-brute request for comments

[Aleksandar Nikolic <nikolic.alek () gmail com>]

This has been commited as 28981.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Aleksandar Nikolic
<nikolic.alek () gmail com> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
> Apparently my ISP thought I won't be needing
> Internet connection this weekend...
>
>
> > done with the brute.firstonly parameter.
> >
> > Also, what do you mean by "quite some time"? If you detect this
> > behavior (pcAnywhere implementation) and if this value is always the
> > same between versions, then your code could just sleep() for this
> > duration? Or is there a need for an active sleep(<short time>) and
> > retry cycle?
>
> In my tests, it the time needed to wait wasn't constant. So this
> wait-and-retry cycle seemed like a best option.
>
> I'll do some cosmetic fixes and, if there are no objections, will
> commit the script later today.
>
> Aleksandar
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/