Re: http-userdir-enum script name

[Toni Ruottu <toni.ruottu () iki fi>]

Could we name it http-prevuln-cve2001-1013 to give clear indication it
needs porting?

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Hani Benhabiles <kroosec () gmail com> wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 12:03 PM, Toni Ruottu wrote:
> >   People,
> >
> > I almost filed http-vuln-cve2001-1013 to the script idea page, but
> > then I noticed that it already exists under name http-userdir-enum.
> > See http://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/http-userdir-enum.html Is there a
> > reason why some vulnerability scripts are named after a cve while
> > others are named by the task they perform?
> >
> >   --Toni
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> > http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> > Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
>
> Hi Toni,
>
> Those that are not named (yet), need to be ported to vulns library as they
> were written before we had it.
>
> Cheers,
> Hani.
>
> --
> Hani Benhabiles
>
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/kroosec
> Blog: http://kroosec.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/