Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE?
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:22:29 -0700
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 07:18:47PM -0400, stripes wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:38:55PM -0700, David Fifield wrote:You should start with the section labeled ------------------------------------------------ ---- ATTACKS ---- ------------------------------------------------ -- These will search for and possibly exploit vulnerabilities. Some of these, I'm sure, already have scripts. For example, this one is http-vmware-path-vuln.nseFor the ones that already have scripts, should they be left in the http-fingerprints.lua or should they be cleaned up as the NSEs are written?
Leave them in http-fingerprints.lua. People running http-enum will still want to see them. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- HTTP fingerprint NSE? stripes (May 14)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? David Fifield (May 14)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? stripes (May 14)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? David Fifield (May 14)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? stripes (May 16)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? David Fifield (May 16)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? stripes (May 14)
- Re: HTTP fingerprint NSE? David Fifield (May 14)