Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch)
From: Anders Sundman <anders () 4zm org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:42:09 +0100
Hi David, On 2012-01-09 05:14, David Fifield wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:51:28AM +0100, Anders Sundman wrote:I suggest combining nodes in the graph that represent anonymous hops between two known devices. / anon_1 \ ..-> ip_a ip_b -> .. => .. -> ip_a -> anon_1 -> ip_b -> .. \ anon_2 / Here is a patch implementing this behavior: http://www.4zm.org/files/2011/integration.py.diffI think I see what this is supposed to be doing, but it didn't work when I tried it. Here's an XML traceroute file and a graphic of what I'm seeing.
Thanks for testing the patch! It only removes one anonymous hop and your trace contains a chain of two anonymous hops. That's the reason why it won't work. It would be great to extend the 'pruning' functionality to cover these chains of anonymous hops as well. However I won't be able to do it any time soon. All the best, Anders _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) Anders Sundman (Jan 03)
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) Colin L Rice (Jan 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) David Fifield (Jan 08)
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) Anders Sundman (Jan 09)
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) David Fifield (Jan 20)
- Re: Reduce zenmap topology noise (patch) Anders Sundman (Jan 09)