Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len (maybe)
From: jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:13:08 +0100
On 07/10/2011 13:59, Gisle Vanem wrote:
nmap -F -v -d -n 195.166.128.231 VC++ - FAIL - route_dst_generic: Failed to obtain system routes: getsysroutes_dnet: sysroutes_dnet_find_interfaces() failed Cygwin - FAIL - pcap_open_live(eth0, 256, 0, 2) FAILED. Reported error: Error opening adapter: The system cannot find the device specified. (20). Will wait 5 seconds then retry. ... Call to pcap_open_live() failed three times. MS-DOS - SUCCESSJust curious; what DOS platform/compiler did you use? I cannot see any way to build nmap on MS-DOS. Re. the failures, have you studied the itnerface/routing table? "nmap --iflist".
Hi Gilse, I built the Release binary under Cygwin using the mswin32/makefile with Visual Studio Express VC++ 2010 on XP SP3. The results of the scans were from the Release binary executed from the MS-DOS and Cygwin shells and the Debug binary was executed from within VC++. The output of nmap --iflist looks fine to me and is as follows: ************************INTERFACES************************ DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MTU MAC eth0 (eth0) 192.168.1.15/24 ethernet up 1500 00:19:21:3D:3F:CE eth0 (eth0) fe80::219:21ff:fe3d:3fce/64 ethernet up 1500 00:19:21:3D:3F:CE lo0 (lo0) 127.0.0.1/0 loopback up 1520 tun0 (tun0) fe80::ffff:ffff:fffd/64 point2point down 1280 tun1 (tun1) (null)/0 point2point up 1280 tun2 (tun2) fe80::5efe:c0a8:10f/64 point2point up 1280 lo1 (lo1) ::1/64 loopback up 1500 lo1 (lo1) fe80::1/64 loopback up 1500 DEV WINDEVICE eth0 \Device\NPF_{3F5D3A0C-7937-48BD-B9FD-B8B36D8884DD} eth0 \Device\NPF_{3F5D3A0C-7937-48BD-B9FD-B8B36D8884DD} lo0 <none> tun0 \Device\NPF_{A4AA2BB0-17C2-48D0-B92D-2C2C7F577DD0} tun1 <none> tun2 <none> lo1 <none> lo1 <none> <none> \Device\NPF_GenericDialupAdapter **************************ROUTES************************** DST/MASK DEV GATEWAY 255.255.255.255/32 eth0 192.168.1.15 192.168.1.255/32 eth0 192.168.1.15 192.168.1.15/32 lo0 127.0.0.1 192.168.1.0/24 eth0 192.168.1.15 127.0.0.0/8 lo0 127.0.0.1 224.0.0.0/4 eth0 192.168.1.15 0.0.0.0/0 eth0 192.168.1.1 Regards, jah _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len (maybe) jah (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len (maybe) jah (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len(maybe) jah (Oct 07)
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len(maybe) David Fifield (Oct 10)
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len(maybe) jah (Oct 11)
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len (maybe) jah (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Scans failing on Win32 - failures differ depending on args len (maybe) David Fifield (Oct 12)