Re: [NSE] Better Handling for Require Errors

[Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>]

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:12:07PM -0400, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com> wrote:
>
> I just thought of another possibility. Since we added the
> stdnse.require function which is just the original function. Maybe
> instead we can keep require the same and add a stdnse.silent_require
> (so reverse them). Then people would use:
>
> stdnse.silent_require "openssl"
>
> I think that might be the best approach. What do you all think?

That sounds great to me.

Cheers,
-F
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/