Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Who is testing the new Nmap IPv6 support


From: Gutek <ange.gutek () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 13:08:11 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Le 11/06/2011 12:08, Fyodor a écrit :
When we released the new IPv6 improvements (Nmap 5.52.IPv6.Beta2) on
Wednesday we received tons of attention on the social networks, but
very few bug reports.  Maybe that means it is working great for
everyone, or perhaps it means that more people retweeted it than
actually try it.  Is anyone here using the IPv6 suppport and can you
post a description of how it is working for you?

Cheers,
Fyodor
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Nothing weird to report so far. I can't say that i have deeply tested
it, nevertheless and for the record here are two reports:

- -----------------
Ecological system
- -----------------
OpenSuse 11.4/2.6.37.6-0.5-default/i686
Nmap version 5.52.IPv6.Beta2 ( http://nmap.org )
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Compiled with: liblua-5.1.4 openssl-1.0.0c libpcre-8.10 libpcap-1.1.1
nmap-libdnet-1.12 ipv6
Compiled without:

- -----------------------------
# nmap -A -v scanme.nmap.org
- -----------------------------
Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (74.207.244.221)
Host is up (0.20s latency).
rDNS record for 74.207.244.221: li86-221.members.linode.com
Not shown: 995 closed ports
PORT      STATE    SERVICE    VERSION
22/tcp    open     ssh        OpenSSH 5.3p1 Debian 3ubuntu6 (protocol 2.0)
| ssh-hostkey: 1024 8d:60:f1:7c:ca:b7:3d:0a:d6:67:54:9d:69:d9:b9:dd (DSA)
|_2048 79:f8:09:ac:d4:e2:32:42:10:49:d3:bd:20:82:85:ec (RSA)
25/tcp    filtered smtp
80/tcp    open     http       Apache httpd 2.2.14 ((Ubuntu))
|_http-methods: GET HEAD POST OPTIONS
|_http-title: Go ahead and ScanMe!
|_http-favicon: Unknown favicon MD5: 156515DA3C0F7DC6B2493BD5CE43F795
9929/tcp  open     nping-echo Nping echo
31337/tcp open     Elite?
Device type: general purpose|WAP|firewall|router
Running (JUST GUESSING): Linux 2.6.X|2.4.X (93%), Netgear embedded
(88%), Linksys Linux 2.4.X (88%), Asus Linux 2.6.X (87%), Check Point
embedded (86%), D-Link embedded (86%), Linksys embedded (86%), Peplink
embedded (86%)
Aggressive OS guesses: Linux 2.6.22 (Fedora Core 6) (93%), Linux 2.6.23
- - 2.6.33 (90%), Linux 2.6.9 - 2.6.27 (90%), Linux 2.6.32 (89%), Linux
2.6.34 (89%), Netgear DG834G WAP (88%), OpenWrt White Russian 0.9 (Linux
2.4.30) (88%), Linux 2.6.22 (88%), Linux 2.6.24 - 2.6.35 (88%), Linux
2.6.31 (87%)
No exact OS matches for host (test conditions non-ideal).
Uptime guess: 35.280 days (since Sat May  7 06:04:56 2011)
Network Distance: 30 hops
TCP Sequence Prediction: Difficulty=203 (Good luck!)
IP ID Sequence Generation: All zeros
Service Info: OS: Linux

TRACEROUTE (using port 443/tcp)
HOP RTT       ADDRESS
1   0.42 ms   192.168.1.254
2   ...
26  53.37 ms  20gigabitethernet1-3.core1.ams1.he.net (195.69.145.150)
27  135.52 ms 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.nyc4.he.net (216.66.24.153)
28  128.86 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net (184.105.213.93)
29  204.75 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (72.52.92.109)
30  203.09 ms 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.fmt1.he.net (66.160.158.241)

(...)
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 161.16 seconds
           Raw packets sent: 1085 (49.432KB) | Rcvd: 1061 (44.512KB)

- --------------------------------
# nmap -6 -A -v scanme.nmap.org
- --------------------------------
Nmap scan report for scanme.nmap.org (2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:cd19)
Host is up (0.19s latency).
Not shown: 998 closed ports
PORT   STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open  ssh     OpenSSH 5.3p1 Debian 3ubuntu6 (protocol 2.0)
| ssh-hostkey: 1024 8d:60:f1:7c:ca:b7:3d:0a:d6:67:54:9d:69:d9:b9:dd (DSA)
|_2048 79:f8:09:ac:d4:e2:32:42:10:49:d3:bd:20:82:85:ec (RSA)
80/tcp open  http    Apache httpd 2.2.14 ((Ubuntu))
|_http-methods: GET HEAD POST OPTIONS
|_http-title: Go ahead and ScanMe!
|_http-favicon: Unknown favicon MD5: 156515DA3C0F7DC6B2493BD5CE43F795
Service Info: OS: Linux

TRACEROUTE (using port 443/tcp)
HOP RTT       ADDRESS
1   0.76 ms   2a01:e34:ee0d:1230::
2   ...
7   57.61 ms  20gigabitethernet1-3.core1.ams1.ipv6.he.net
(2001:7f8:1::a500:6939:1)
8   66.19 ms  10gigabitethernet1-4.core1.lon1.he.net (2001:470:0:3f::1)
9   123.45 ms 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net (2001:470:0:3e::1)
10  139.51 ms 10gigabitethernet8-3.core1.chi1.he.net (2001:470:0:1c6::2)
11  191.80 ms 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.den1.he.net (2001:470:0:1af::2)
12  191.27 ms 10gigabitethernet4-4.core1.sjc2.he.net (2001:470:0:1b4::1)
13  196.90 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net (2001:470:0:2f::1)
14  193.58 ms 2001:470:1:1db::2
15  190.71 ms 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe93:cd19

(...)
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 47.05 seconds
           Raw packets sent: 1253 (80.172KB) | Rcvd: 1027 (62.528KB)

Regards,

A.G.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk3zTJsACgkQ3aDTTO0ha7gouwCePkW2fTbTbHbqSAwp5LW9204A
wGMAnieXd6jVboUvV0/9xnfTINzPoc7x
=9OJX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: