Re: backorifice-brute page

[Gorjan Petrovski <mogi57 () gmail com>]

Yeah, perhaps it'd be better under the descritption.
On May 19, 2011 2:18 PM, "Toni Ruottu" <toni.ruottu () iki fi> wrote:
> > We thought long and hard about the circumstances under which the script
to
> > run. Since the only way of finding out whether a password is incorrect
was
> > through a timeout, and this service isn't quite the popular one, we
decided
> > to make the ports argument mandatory so it doesn't run by default. If it
> > detects an open|filtered 31337/udp port, it suggests that it could be run
> > against it.
>
> Oh, yes. I see. I misread the code.
>
> > As for the summary, I think it's good to have it. Most of Nmap's users
> > aren't typical users anyway, so they might use some insight into the
> > building blocks of a certain script. It's a quite subjective topic. :-)
>
> I am not complaining about the comment in the code. Do we really want
> to have that comment on the web page? If yes, do we want to have it
> under title "Script Output"?
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/