Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: salt in version probes
From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:12:43 -0800
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 09:07:31PM +0200, Toni Ruottu wrote:
Some protocols require client to send a random number that is echoed back by the server. What kind of version probe should I write for such protocols? Is it okay to just create a random number and hard code that into the probe if the server seems to be okay with that?
If a static value works, just use a static value. (And document it so people don't look for meaning in it.) Anything more complicated needs a script. David Fifield _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/
Current thread:
- salt in version probes Toni Ruottu (Jan 14)
- Re: salt in version probes David Fifield (Jan 15)
- Re: salt in version probes Toni Ruottu (Jan 16)
- Re: salt in version probes Toni Ruottu (Jan 17)
- Re: salt in version probes David Fifield (Jan 31)
- Re: salt in version probes Toni Ruottu (Feb 06)
- Re: salt in version probes Toni Ruottu (Jan 16)
- Re: salt in version probes David Fifield (Jan 15)