Re: interactive mode

[alejandro ramos <aramosf.lists () gmail com>]

Sorry David, I don't know how can I submit a new proposal/idea.

What about using this keys:
--min-hostgroup/max-hostgroup                   h/H
--min-parallelism/max-parallelism                 p/P
--min-rtt-timeout/max-rtt-timeout/initial-rtt-timeout      r/R
--host-timeout
--scan-delay/--max-scan-delay
--defeat-rst-ratelimit
-T1...T5                                                    t/T


2010/11/16 David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:41:29AM -0600, Ron wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:03:28 +0100 alejandro ramos <aramosf.lists () gmail com> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > What about to add interactive keys to change performance options when
> > > running long nmaps like
> > >
> > > --min-hostgroup/max-hostgroup
> > > --min-parallelism/max-parallelism
> > > --min-rtt-timeout/max-rtt-timeout/initial-rtt-timeout
> > > --host-timeout
> > > --scan-delay/--max-scan-delay
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > We talked about this at Defcon, and I personally think it's a great idea.
> >
> > I don't know what kind of complexities might crop up, though, with changing this stuff in the middle of a scan.
>
> I think it would help to have a proposal for the user interface should
> be, as in what keys should have what effect. That's probably the most
> useful thing short of a patch.
>
> David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/