Re: sslv2 script bug

[David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>]

On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:44:56AM -0400, Matt Selsky wrote:
> > It seems like if no ciphers are offered for SSLv2, then it should be  
> > considered off.  Maybe in verbose mode, if would report "supports 
> > SSLv2, but no ciphers".
>
> I came up with a patch to do this.
>
> Patch 1 reports "supports SSLv2 protocol, but no cyphers".  Patch 2  
> considers "no cyphers" to be equivalent to "no SSLv2" and reports 
> nothing.

Thank you, Matt. I committed your Patch 1 in r19552.

David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/