Re: bug in svn 17300

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

On 08/05/2010 23:49, David Fifield wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:55:34PM +0100, jah wrote:
>   
> > On 06/05/2010 22:38, David Fifield wrote:
> >     
> > > Thanks, that confirms my suspicion. Changing the probe was probably
> > > enough to avoid triggering whatever IDS rule was causing the bogus ICMP
> > > response to be sent. Anyway, I've added EPROTO to the list of known
> > > error code (that won't cause Nmap to abort) in r17488.
> > >   
> > >       
> > I'm getting a compiler error because of EPROTO:
> >
> > ..\service_scan.cc(2271) : error C2065: 'EPROTO' : undeclared identifier
> >
> >
> > I can't find a windows equivalent for EPROTO and from a quick google,
> > there doesn't seem to be one defined for BSD variants either (for
> > example [1] and [2]) so perhaps the EPROTO case in service_scan should
> > be wrapped in an ifdef directive as in the attached patch.
> >
> > Sound OK?
> >     
> Looks great, please do.
>   
Done.
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/