Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: POC Payloader dat


From: David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:41:29 -0700

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:36:58PM -0500, Jay Fink wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:43 PM, David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:


It also handles inline comments gracefully.

What I have left is:
- the key matching uses strstr, it shouldn't do that for obvious
reasons :) needs changed
- assigning dports
- assigning sports
- making sure memory is dealt with gracefully/correctly

Looks great! I'm eager to see the finished product. Remember that we'll
be looking up payloads not by name, but by protocol/port, so see if you
can make your test program work like this:

$ ./payload 53 udp
\x00\x00\x10\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00

Ah okay, I was thinking we would still use a payload_name field but
now that I think of it IIRC we tossed that and having multiple
payloads/port (at least for now) in favor of *just getting the
payloads out* :)

You can keep the payload names--that might be useful in the future. It's
just that we won't be looking them up that way.

David Fifield
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/


Current thread: